Sacramento is California’s state capital and a major distribution hub where I-5, I-80, and SR-99 converge. The city serves as a freight gateway between the Bay Area, the Central Valley, and the Sierra Nevada, with both large national carriers and regional agricultural haulers operating across its corridors. Below are five highly rated law firms in Sacramento that handle truck accident and personal injury cases.
1. Dreyer Babich Buccola Wood Campora, LLP
About the Firm: Dreyer Babich Buccola Wood Campora has a record-setting track record in Northern California, including a $34.9 million jury verdict in Sacramento County for a paralysis case and a $24.3 million verdict in a truck accident involving a 9-year-old girl. The firm represents truck accident victims throughout California and nationwide.
Services:
- Semi-truck and tractor-trailer accident claims
- Catastrophic injury and wrongful death representation
- Federal and state trucking regulation litigation
- Insurance negotiation and trial representation
- Nationwide truck accident representation
Address: Sacramento, CA
Phone: (916) 999-9132
Website: https://www.dbbwc.com/practice-areas/auto-accidents/trucking-accidents/
2. Arnold Law Firm (Justice4You)
About the Firm: For more than 40 years, the Arnold Law Firm has helped accident victims throughout Sacramento get the compensation they deserve. Founder Clayeo C. Arnold has practiced personal injury law in California since 1980 and is a member of The Million Dollar Advocates Forum and a past president of the Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association.
Services:
- Truck and big rig accident claims
- Product liability in truck accidents
- Wrongful death representation
- Insurance company negotiation
- Free consultations, contingency fee
Address: Sacramento, CA
Phone: (916) 777-7777
Website: https://www.justice4you.com/sacramento-truck-accident-attorney.html
3. AutoAccident.com (Edward Smith Law Offices)
About the Firm: AutoAccident.com’s Sacramento-based legal team has decades of collective experience handling big rig and 18-wheeler collisions in Northern California. The firm is available anytime to meet with clients and provides free, friendly advice for truck accident victims across Sacramento County.
Services:
- Big rig and commercial truck accident claims
- Tractor-trailer collision representation
- Negligent trucking company investigation
- Wrongful death cases
- Free consultations, available anytime
Address: Sacramento County, CA
Phone: (916) 921-6400 / (800) 404-5400
Website: https://autoaccident.com/trucking-accidents/
4. Eason & Tambornini (CapCityLaw)
About the Firm: Eason & Tambornini is known for fast action, initiating discovery to preserve time-sensitive electronic data on day one. The firm monitors Sacramento’s high-traffic arterials and freeway hazards including the I-5/Highway 50 interchange and Arden Way corridor for truck accident cases.
Services:
- Commercial truck and semi-truck accident claims
- Electronic data and black box preservation
- Multi-party liability determination
- Wrongful death litigation
- Free case reviews
Address: Sacramento, CA
Phone: (916) 483-1819
Website: https://www.capcitylaw.com/sacramento-truck-accident-attorneys/
5. Mastagni Holstedt, APC
About the Firm: Mastagni Holstedt has extensive regulatory knowledge necessary for commercial trucking company lawsuits. With offices in Sacramento, Rancho Cucamonga, Pleasanton, and Redwood City, the firm has a strong track record of proving regulatory violations that demonstrate trucking driver and company negligence.
Services:
- Commercial trucking regulation litigation
- Semi-truck and 18-wheeler accident claims
- Federal FMCSA violation cases
- Wrongful death representation
- Multilocation California representation
Address: 1912 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95811
Phone: (916) 446-4692
Website: https://www.mastagni.com/practice-areas/truck-accident-attorney/
Frequently Asked Questions About Truck Accidents in Sacramento, CA
Sacramento is the state capital and a major distribution hub where I-5, I-80, and SR-99 converge. Does the high density of state government vehicles in Sacramento create any complications for truck accident claims?
State-owned vehicles operated by California state agencies are governed by the California Government Claims Act under Government Code §911.2, which requires filing a claim with the California Victim Compensation Board within six months of the injury before you can file a lawsuit. This applies whether the vehicle is a Caltrans maintenance truck, a CHP vehicle, or any other state-operated commercial vehicle. The six-month deadline runs from the date of injury, not from when you learn that a state vehicle was involved, so identifying the truck’s owner accurately at the scene or immediately after is essential. Claims against private carriers run under the standard two-year statute of limitations without the government claims process.
California’s AB5 has been particularly contested in Sacramento’s logistics and distribution sector. How does the ongoing litigation over AB5 affect a truck accident case where the driver’s employment status is disputed?
AB5 remains active California law even though federal courts have issued rulings that have complicated its application specifically to pre-empted FMCSA-regulated carriers. For accidents involving drivers whose employment status under AB5 is genuinely disputed, courts look at the totality of the working relationship rather than waiting for the AB5 litigation to settle. The practical approach is to name both the driver and the carrier as defendants, assert both employer liability and independent contractor liability theories in the alternative, and let discovery establish the actual working relationship. Sacramento-based attorneys who handle both employment law and personal injury cases are well-positioned to navigate the intersection of AB5 and trucking liability that arises in these disputes.
What is California’s statute of limitations for a truck accident lawsuit filed in Sacramento, and does Caltrans’s involvement on I-5 or I-80 create any procedural complications?
California gives you two years from the date of injury under Code of Civil Procedure §335.1. If Caltrans’s road maintenance or signage contributed to the accident, the six-month government claim filing requirement under the Government Claims Act applies before you can sue Caltrans in Superior Court. For private carrier claims, no pre-suit notice is required. Sacramento County Superior Court is the filing venue for accidents within Sacramento County, and the court’s complex litigation program handles major truck accident cases with experienced judicial officers. The combination of a potential government claim against Caltrans and a separate private carrier claim means two different procedural timelines run simultaneously, and managing both from the date of injury requires organizing representation early.
Sacramento’s position as the state capital means that a significant portion of the commercial truck traffic on I-5, I-80, and US-50 involves state agency vehicles operating under California Department of General Services fleet management, CalTrans maintenance operations, and construction contractor vehicles working on state highway projects. When a state-owned truck or a contractor vehicle on a state project causes an accident near Sacramento, the California Government Claims Act under Government Code §945.4 requires filing a claim with the California Victim Compensation Board within six months of the injury as a condition precedent to filing suit against the state. This six-month deadline is the most important procedural timing requirement in Sacramento government vehicle cases and runs concurrently with, but independently from, the two-year personal injury limitations period. The California Department of General Services maintains records of all state fleet vehicles and their assigned agencies, which are obtainable through Public Records Act requests and allow plaintiffs to identify the specific state entity responsible for a vehicle that carried only generic state markings at the scene. Sacramento County Superior Court’s rules require mandatory settlement conferences in complex personal injury cases before trial, a procedure that can affect litigation strategy when the defendant includes both a state agency with a government claims cap and a private carrier with uncapped exposure.